<p>To 71.201.16.135 High school dxd, time I got reincarnated as a slime(ends up a harem in webnovel), date a live and death march in another world I didn't read so I can't comment. In another world with my smartphone, infinite stratos and sekirei as far as I read they fit your equation. Arifureta on the other hand does not fit very well since the protagonist Hajime is only interested in Yue and never showed interest in a harem. (I may be wrong since I just read the beginning of the light novel and I don't remember it right - the manga and anime are much more advanced than I read on LN)   </p><p>
Sword art online and Rakudai kishi no cavalry don't fit your equation </p><p>
</p><p>
Ps .: before calling someone a child I suggest you create an account and log in because it seems too immature and cowardly to call others a child while staying anonymous behind a temporary IP. </p>

<p>@anon </p><p>You are not addressing in all of you comments one point which is the one that invalids all of your claims. Bell doesn’t want a harem. </p><p>Kevhunt may had used only a part of your formula but I used all of it and I hadn’t seen you say something about it, so I will repeat myself once again. Based in your formula it makes the end with a harem not possible since Bell doesn’t want one(something that you don’t admit). You are using only parts of the LN that prove your point without taking in count the others that contradict it which are more and even more solid than the ones you use. </p><p>You say Kevhunt misinterpret your claims but you also do the same with mine. You are saying that I said that we shouldn’t compare DanMachi with other LN while what I said is that are plenty more to compare with than you propose. </p><p>Liaris Freese is usually interpreted as it takes in count other goals and feelings, but it had already been said(by people that know Japanese) that it is not totally accurate the translation, that if you read it directly in Japanese is phrased in a way that specifies it only works based in Bell’s feelings for Ais. </p><p>Until you respond to this and stop insulting people you can’t really say you are answering to my claims. Also you are actually being as childish as you say Kevhunt is. </p>

<p>Do not go too far in your ideas until you lose their meaning, remember that you are only Theorizing about a possibility that it has a high probability or not </p><p>There are special topics for this as engelo said </p><p>For who is from the end of LN 15: </p><p>I find it very interesting that Bell receives personal information about Aiz Wallenstein, although he does not know what the name of Albert Wallendstein means in Aiz, he still has questions about that, we can theorize that in very soon the Arc Aiz will start, I want to say FINALLY. </p><p>Little questioning about the identity of this character because he looks strangely like Bell from a physical point of view, could it be that Bell and Aiz is the reincarnation of Aria and Albert?
I ask myself this question. </p><p>then the fact of seeing Aiz cry must have prompted a lot of questions from Bell Crannel, the only times he saw Aiz sad / angry is in volume 8 when they talk about the scale of the BDEO and at the end of the volume 15, will Bell make the link? Maybe a lack of clue but it's a very small possibility </p><p>The fact that Aiz did not answer Bell when he called him must work him even more and find it suspicious, will Bell ask Aiz questions about his father's grave in a clumsy way? </p><p>I would like to have your opinions. </p>

<p>Aria it's not deadh. Ais it's not reincarnation Aria Yes Bell can be. ARIA is inside the dragon more than sure. And he uses his power in a way. Just as the little dragon was trying to absorb the demi spirit within him. </p><p>Then Bell fought the minotaur. Ais feared he would be killed. And he wanted to interfere. But Albert's possible soul or imagination stopped her. Albert: Look at the fight. </p><p>Ais did not think that Bell has qualities to be adventurous. She said it is too clean and has no potential. He was referring to his cleansed eyes without mistake, without the desire to fight. </p><p>She believed that Bell does not have the will and wickedness of an adventurer in combat. But then she probably saw at that moment she saw the same look Albert had when fighting. A look full of determination and courage. The look of a hero. </p><p>Until then, Ais was only interested in Bell's rapid creation. After that it is noticed that she is more interested in him. Even jealous when he sees Bell talking to other women. He fears he will lose something that belongs to him. So she probably wants to see if Bell looks so much like her father in his actions. And it proves with every action that yes. And he follows the progress with another interest from the beginning, when he only wanted the secret of fast growth. And this may or may not be true. Also in this story. Albert is in any case a very loved and known hero, everyone wants to be like him. Bell will certainly be a bigger hero than Albert. Destroy the dragon with one eye. And then Ais will probably remember Albert's words. Which told her that one day she would meet her hero. </p>

<p>The fact that Aria is inside the dragon is not a bad theory I find it interesting </p><p>Aiz does not have Bell only for the sake of his power, but his way of acting his kindness, his purity, his honesty are also part of Ais's interest, as Rigel31415 said above his Larias freese le owes that to a person, Bell constantly thinks of his objective, to be hero and to be with Ais he will not be able to allow himself to die before having fulfilled his objective pushed by his exeptinel competence, Aiz is the heroine of Bell and Bell will become Aiz's hero like Albert was for Aria, it is clear that she does not understand her feelings for Bell because she never experienced these feelings there but in a fairly intense moment or Bell will be in danger death, or Aiz would be exposed to certain danger of death or Bell will make her heroic appearance and protect her, I have a very good chance of believing that they will share moments together or their relationship will develop as quickly as Larias freese, before the final battle, and Bell will have twice as much feelings for Aiz and will fight BDOE with incredible growth force, he will fight with all his soul desiring to give back to Aiz what was stolen from him, of course there will be a moment of despair during the fight there will be dead, that's for sure, but there will surely be a combined attack from Aiz and Bell together, or a skill gained by fighting with Aiz, or else combined the two attacks The argo vesta and the Lil rafaga , a devastating attack, I also dare imagine that they will both be 8/9 level (the only ones from Oarario) </p>

<p>@Gonzulolz </p><p>At the rhythm of the history, no one is going to level up except the ones who had been in that level for years already. Since Ais just level up a few months ago there is still too much time before she even becomes Level 7. What she could do is use Avenger since using it makes her incredibly powerful, since she was able to fight against Revis who is supposed to be even stronger than Ottar so Revis must had been as strong as a low Level 8 or a high Level 7 at least. </p>

<p>Yes I imagine well, thank you for these details it is true that I had forgotten this point there, that Aiz has just Level up by dint of seeing Bell will progress as quickly I forget how much it requires effort, but yes with Avengers she become overpowered. </p><p>We can maybe imagine that Ais could develop an additional skill similar to that of Bell born from a deeply emotional moment, produced by Bell, but I have a little trouble with this idea there, Ais is already overpowered with Ariel + avengers i don't see why add a power up </p>

<p>@Gozulolz </p><p>Just a tip, when you are talking about theories, avoid using words like fact with them, it has the implication that you are trying to state something that is rather than theory. The same can be said for words like; is or are. </p><p><i>The fact that Aria is inside the dragon is not a bad theory I find it interesting </i>- example- This sentence has an oxymoron in it, fact and theory are contrary word here, fact should be idea. </p><p>It would help with people, mostly me, not confusing you theories as something you are trying to state as fact. </p>

<p>@Rigel </p><p>The definition for Liaris Freese in English isn't that bad, granted the limits of English just can't convey the nuanced meaning Japanese can, but there is no real reason for the confusion that follows it around.  </p><p>By definition, <i>Continued desire results in continued growth, Stronger desire results in stronger growth.' </i>​​​ </p><p><i>Continued desire</i> makes the skill specific to something. If that specific desire ends, Liaris Freese loses its affect. Even with the mistranslation of desire and feelings, it still shouldn't be hard to figure out singular and non-plural nature of the description. For the skill to work something has to continue if that desire ceases so to would the effect. There is nothing in the description that supports the idea that the skill can bounce from different desires.  </p><p><i>Continued feelings results in continued growth, Stronger feelings results in stronger growth.' </i>​​​ </p><p>Edit: Actually I do know where some of the confusion comes from, people regularly forget that Bell obtains his drive to be worthy of standing next to Ais after he already had Liaris Freese and mistake his desire to become stronger as the desire/feelings tied to Liaris Freese. </p>

<div class="quote"><i>Kevhunt06 wrote:
@Gozulolz <p>Just a tip, when you are talking about theories, avoid using words like fact with them, it has the implication that you are trying to state something that is rather than theory. The same can be said for words like; is or are. </p><p><i>The fact that Aria is inside the dragon is not a bad theory I find it interesting </i>- example- This sentence has an oxymoron in it, fact and theory are contrary word here, fact should be idea. </p><p>It would help with people, mostly me, not confusing you theories as something you are trying to state as fact. </p> </i></div>
<p>You are right, I apologize for having expressed myself badly and I reiterate the nature of my text I will try to be more careful next time. </p><p>Aria in a dragon is a theory, stated by Rigiel previously so it cannot be interpreted as being a fact but an interesting theory. </p><p>
Regarding Aiz it relates to some "fact" mix with MY theory fact example: Aiz does not understand these feelings, makes sense </p><p>Example on my theory: Aiz could develop a skill similar to bell (even if I believe very weakly) </p><p>But you are right I have used therms which are not relevant to what I meant, excuse me. </p>