Since I began to participate in this wiki, I have seen that there are certain recurring doubts about this universe that have generated endless debates about it, it is all because the author has never been clear about these issues, being ambiguous and even contradictory about it.
Next, I expose which are the most controversial questions that I have seen, namely:
1. How exactly does leveling work? It has been said and it has been shown that the difference in level, even of a single level, results in an abysmal difference in power, it can be concluded then that the impulse to increase in level is abysmal to generate by itself the gap that is known as level difference.
However, how this boost operates remains a total mystery, I have seen theories about such as: it is a uniform gigantic boost for everyone, others propose that the statistics are added arithmetically or added by multipliers and etc., whatever it is, it's not known officially.
2. How are the statistics reflected in power? Basically the numbers of the statistics indicate in which basic abilities an adventurer is good and in which he isn't, however, how much power each point brings is not clear, for example, in the case that two adventurers of the same level face each other, from what value (number) is an abysmal difference generated? there are several examples in the series that suggest different amounts for this value, which does not allow knowing how much of an advantage a high status has against a low status.
There is also the issue of how stats from previous levels are reflected in the current level. In the novels it is literally said that the statistics of previous levels affect the current level, but Bell is the only known case, as far as I know, where this phenomenon has been evidenced, which allows me to conclude that for a previous statistic to be reflected must be very high (SS, SSS), however, the matter is up in the air.
3. How powerful is Bell really? This question is a direct consequence of the previous one, many of us think that Bell has a power above his level, even with stats at 0, in fact that is the official position of this wiki, however, there are users who do not admit it, They are of the opinion that Bell needs high stats for the boost to give him higher level power.
Also, even assuming that he does indeed have a full level boost or more, the question remains as to how big it is: level and a half, level and three quarters, almost two levels? ...indeterminate.
4. what is the real range of the skills and magic in the statuses? Many skills and/or magic increase a particular basic ability or even the entire status, but how much is never specified, the status pages only contain the minimum details to know what the skill consists of but not how it works and this is where we start to see a very clear tendency of the author towards the omission of information, it is particular and highly questionable that in the recent status pages they no longer even contain the descriptions, only the mere names, it is worth asking what is the cause of this.
These 4 previous questions are directly related to the system of power, my theory about why Omori has never resolved them is because ambiguity favors creative freedom, it is like when a politician gives vague answers during an electoral campaign, by not taking clear positions, he can do/write what he wants and he can't be accused of contradicting himself because nothing was ever firmly established.
Lastly, the only issue not directly related to the power system is the ranking of the strongest adventurers. This has really given us something to talk about, I would dare to say that it is the most debated topic in this wiki, at least since I joined. Omori has only said that Ottar is the strongest of all, and that Finn is the strongest of the Loki family, both things are obvious if we look at their statuses and if we consider that they are the captains, but for everyone else there is only uncertainty.
If we analyze the novels, in the few scenarios in which the strongest have faced each other, we see a deliberate omission of information and development by the author, for example, both in the Freya episode and at the end of volume 17 we saw clashes between the Freya and Loki families but they did not go beyond the simple mention, as soon as the fighting began he immediately cut the scenes and did not mention any result in later events and also, if we take into account that absolutely no member of Loki participated in the war game, there is no doubt that Omori does not want to be known who is better than who among them.
On this point I must admit that I can't think of any why, that is, I can't understand what is the problem about they fight one another and there are winners and losers, even more so because that is what the fans wanted to see, hence it is the most debated topic.
The only thing that comes to mind is a forced theory, namely: the fans wanted to see the fights but they all have their favorites who obviously want to see win. In the event that there are losers, the fans of these characters could leave the series, something like Hogni lost against Gareth or Allen, an intense fan of this character like IkariSon would clearly not like it and a follower of the series could leave the franchise.
As a countermeasure for such a scenario, it is best that they do not face each other and it is up to each person to interpret what the power ranking is, where each one can be happy seeing what they want to see. I know it sounds exaggerated but I can't think of any other reason.
In conclusion, the idea of this post is not that you answer my questions, for example that you tell me what your model for leveling up is or what your ranking of the strongest characters is, but rather that you tell me why you think that Omori will never has given clarity to none of these issues.
Or even better, if you think I'm wrong and can deny me and show that Omori has explained in detail any of these issues, I would be happy to know your explanation, for this I would appreciate if you present official information whose veracity is beyond of all reasonable doubt, that is, that it be explicit, not interpretative.
Also, it would be great if you can present any other issue that has generated a lot of debate and that does not have precise resolutions on the part of the author either.